A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Disapproval; Colorado; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period".

This joint resolution, SJRES139, aims to disapprove a specific Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule concerning Colorado's Regional Haze Plan for its second implementation period. The EPA rule imposes stricter emissions controls on industrial facilities, primarily affecting power generation and manufacturing. Disapproval of this rule would alleviate regulatory burdens and potential compliance costs for companies operating in Colorado, particularly those with significant emissions. The money trail in this scenario is indirect. If the resolution passes, companies avoid capital expenditures for new emissions control technologies or operational changes to meet stricter standards. This translates to preserved earnings and potentially higher profit margins for affected entities. Conversely, companies that specialize in environmental compliance technologies or renewable energy solutions might see reduced demand in Colorado if the EPA rule is overturned. Historically, congressional disapproval of EPA rules has occurred, though it is not common. For example, in March 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed a resolution disapproving an Obama-era EPA rule on methane emissions from oil and gas operations. Following this, major oil and gas companies like Exxon Mobil ($XOM) and Chevron ($CVX) saw their stock prices remain relatively stable, as the market had largely priced in the expected deregulation. The immediate market impact of such disapprovals is often muted unless the rule represented a significant, unexpected cost burden. Specific winners if this resolution passes include large energy producers with operations in Colorado, such as Xcel Energy ($XEL) and Black Hills Corp ($BHC), as they would avoid compliance costs. Industrial manufacturers in the state would also benefit. Losers would be companies providing emissions control technology or renewable energy infrastructure that would have seen increased demand under the EPA rule, though specific publicly traded companies with significant exposure solely to Colorado's regional haze compliance market are limited. The resolution's sponsor, Senator Bennet, a Democrat, suggests bipartisan or at least cross-party concern regarding the EPA rule's impact on Colorado, which gives it some legislative momentum. The resolution is currently on the Senate Legislative Calendar. It must pass both the Senate and the House and then be signed by the President to take effect. The timeline for a vote in the Senate is uncertain but could occur in the coming months. If it passes the Senate, it moves to the House, where its fate depends on the House leadership's priorities and the broader political climate.