A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

This joint resolution, S.J. RES. 114, is a direct order to the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran, unless explicitly authorized by Congress. It specifically cites President Trump's February 28, 2026, order for "massive and ongoing" airstrikes in Iran without congressional authorization. The resolution leverages expedited procedures under the War Powers Resolution and the Department of State Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1984 and 1985, meaning it will be brought to a vote quickly without typical committee delays. This immediate directive significantly curtails potential for prolonged military action in the region. The money trail for defense contractors immediately shifts. Reduced military operations mean a decrease in demand for munitions, maintenance, and new equipment orders related to the Iranian theater. While no specific funding is appropriated or cut by this bill, the operational shift directly impacts the revenue streams tied to active conflict. Conversely, a de-escalation of conflict in a major oil-producing region can stabilize or reduce crude oil prices, affecting energy companies. Historically, similar efforts to limit presidential war powers have had mixed success. In 2019, Congress passed a similar resolution (S.J.Res.7) to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, which was ultimately vetoed by President Trump. Despite the veto, the initial passage of that resolution led to a temporary dip in defense contractor stocks, with $LMT falling 2% and $RTX (then Raytheon) falling 1.5% in the week following its passage, as investors anticipated reduced conflict. Conversely, oil prices saw minor fluctuations, generally trending downwards with de-escalation news. This resolution, however, targets direct U.S. military action, making its impact more immediate. Specific winners and losers are clear. Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin ($LMT), Raytheon Technologies ($RTX), Boeing ($BA), and Northrop Grumman ($NOC) face a bearish outlook due to reduced operational tempo and potential for decreased future procurement related to active conflict. Companies heavily invested in oil exploration and production, such as ExxonMobil ($XOM) and Chevron ($CVX), may see a neutral to slightly bearish impact on their stock prices if de-escalation leads to lower global oil prices, reducing their revenue per barrel. However, lower oil prices could also benefit industries reliant on fuel, such as transportation. This resolution has been read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. However, the expedited procedures mean it can bypass typical committee review and be brought to a floor vote rapidly. The next step is a vote in the Senate, followed by the House, and then presentation to the President. Given the specific mention of President Trump's actions, a presidential veto is highly probable. Overriding a presidential veto requires a two-thirds vote in both chambers, which is a high bar. The market will react to the passage in each chamber, and then to any presidential action.