A joint resolution to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.

This joint resolution, S.J. RES. 117, mandates the immediate removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in or against Iran that Congress has not authorized. The bill text explicitly states that Congress has not declared war on Iran and has not authorized military force in the region. The resolution cites statements from President Trump and Secretary of Defense Hegseth acknowledging a 'war' and the potential for ground forces. This action directly curtails ongoing military operations and future engagements, impacting the demand for defense equipment and services. The money trail for defense contractors will shift dramatically. Reduced military presence and engagement in a conflict zone like Iran mean fewer contracts for maintenance, logistics, munitions, and advanced weaponry. Companies like Lockheed Martin ($LMT), Raytheon Technologies ($RTX), Boeing ($BA), and Northrop Grumman ($NOC) will see a decrease in demand for their products and services tied to this specific theater of operations. The mechanism is a direct cessation of military activity, which translates to a reduction in procurement and operational spending. The immediate impact is a contraction of the addressable market for defense contractors in the Middle East. Historically, shifts in U.S. military posture in the Middle East have directly impacted defense and energy markets. For example, following the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq in 2011, defense spending saw a gradual decline over the subsequent years, impacting major contractors. Conversely, oil prices often react to perceived stability or instability in the region. When the U.S. announced the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan in April 2021, defense stocks like $LMT and $RTX experienced minor dips, while oil prices remained volatile, reacting more to global demand than regional military presence. However, a direct mandate to remove forces from an active or potential conflict zone with a major oil producer like Iran creates a different dynamic, increasing geopolitical risk and oil price volatility. For instance, the 1979 Iranian Revolution led to a significant oil supply shock and price surge, demonstrating the market's sensitivity to Iranian stability. Specific losers include major defense contractors: Lockheed Martin ($LMT), Raytheon Technologies ($RTX), Boeing ($BA), and Northrop Grumman ($NOC). These companies derive significant revenue from U.S. military contracts, and a reduction in operational scope directly impacts their order books. The energy sector will experience increased volatility. Major oil companies like ExxonMobil ($XOM), Chevron ($CVX), and BP ($BP) face uncertainty in supply chains and pricing due to potential instability in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for oil shipments. There are no clear winners from this resolution; the immediate effect is a reduction in defense spending and increased energy market risk. The resolution has been introduced in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. The next step is committee consideration. Given the sponsorship by Senator Schiff and three cosponsors, it has some legislative momentum. If it passes the committee, it moves to a full Senate vote. If passed by both chambers and signed into law, the removal of forces is mandated immediately.