Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025

This bill, HR2357, amends the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to ensure striking workers and their households remain eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Current law generally disqualifies households if a member is on strike, unless they were eligible prior to the strike. This bill removes that disqualification, allowing striking workers to access SNAP benefits regardless of their pre-strike eligibility. This change directly increases the pool of individuals eligible for food assistance, translating to higher demand for groceries and consumer staples. The money trail for this bill is indirect but clear. Increased SNAP eligibility means more federal funds will be spent on food purchases. These funds flow directly to retailers that accept SNAP benefits. There is no direct appropriation in the bill; rather, it expands eligibility for an existing federal program. The mechanism is regulatory relief, expanding the scope of who can receive existing benefits. This means a larger customer base for grocery stores and other food retailers. Historically, expansions of food assistance programs have shown a direct correlation with increased sales for grocery retailers. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, temporary expansions of SNAP benefits and other food aid programs led to significant sales increases for grocery chains. While specific market data for past strike-related SNAP changes is limited due to the narrow scope of previous rules, the general principle holds: more eligible recipients for food aid translates to more spending at grocery stores. The 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which temporarily increased SNAP benefits, led to a measurable increase in grocery sales for major retailers. While not directly comparable to a strike-related change, it illustrates the impact of increased SNAP funding on retail. Specific winners include major grocery retailers and general merchandise stores that sell food. Walmart ($WMT), Kroger ($KR), Costco ($COST), Target ($TGT), and Amazon ($AMZN) through its Whole Foods and Amazon Fresh services, all stand to gain from an expanded SNAP recipient base. These companies derive significant revenue from food sales, and an increase in SNAP purchasing power directly boosts their top line. There are no clear losers from this bill, as it expands benefits without directly impacting other market participants negatively. This bill has been referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture. Given the 77 cosponsors and the sponsorship by Rep. Alma S. Adams (D-NC-12), a senior member, it has moderate legislative momentum. The next step is committee consideration and potential markup. If it passes the House, it would then move to the Senate. The timeline for passage is uncertain but could occur within the current legislative session.